Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Rev. Dr. Ronald Moore's avatar

Mark, thank you for assembling this material so carefully. What you have presented is not merely a political concern, it is an ecclesial and theological one. The issue here is not immigration policy, or even activism, but the integrity of the Church’s witness and the sacred purpose of the pulpit.

The Church has always taught that the ministry of Word and Sacrament is consecrated for one purpose: to proclaim Christ and form His people in holiness. When a sermon ceases to call sinners to repentance, to unfold the Scriptures, or to lift souls toward God, and instead becomes a vehicle for partisan mobilization, the Church loses the very thing that makes her the Church.

It is entirely fitting for Christians to care for the vulnerable, including immigrants. That is not in question. But the rhetoric quoted here, “gestapo,” “masked fascists,” “terrorizing our people,” “melt ICE”, is not Christian proclamation. It is the language of political struggle elevated to a kind of pseudo-sacramental urgency.

And when clergy present particular political actions, patrols, and protests as if they were the necessary expression of Kingdom righteousness, they risk exchanging the Gospel’s transcendent call for the narrower demands of a political program. The Kingdom of God cannot be reduced to any earthly cause, no matter how passionately held.

The Church’s authority is moral and spiritual, not coercive or partisan.

Her task is to form consciences, not direct political operations.

Her power is the Cross, not activism.

Once the pulpit becomes a command center for political action, even with good intentions, it ceases to be the pulpit in the Christian sense. The Fathers remind us that the shepherd must guard the flock from every ideology that would claim the allegiance of the soul. That warning applies as much to the left as to the right.

The concern here is theological before it is political.

The sermons you’ve quoted represent a shift in the very understanding of what preaching is for. And that should alarm all of us who care about the faithfulness and unity of the Church.

I appreciate your commitment to “just the facts.” Those facts now call for sober reflection by our leaders, not for the sake of any party, but for the sake of the Gospel we proclaim.

David Roseberry's avatar

First of all, thank you, Mark, for your post.

We need to remember something important: Anglican clergy are under orders. None of us functions as an independent actor. We preach, teach, and serve under the oversight of our bishops. That’s by design.

So if readers in ACNA are rightly concerned about what’s happening at Christ Our Advocate, the most appropriate next step is contacting the bishop of C4SO directly. Ask for clarity. Seek accountability. This is how our tradition handles these things.

Meeting real needs is good and biblical. But using the pulpit for partisan vilification or organizing patrols is outside the church’s purpose and requires pastoral oversight. That oversight belongs to the bishop, and he should hear from the faithful.

David Roseberry

The Anglican

79 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?